↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Echo intensity obtained from ultrasonography images reflecting muscle strength in elderly men

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Interventions in Aging, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
244 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
312 Mendeley
Title
Echo intensity obtained from ultrasonography images reflecting muscle strength in elderly men
Published in
Clinical Interventions in Aging, July 2013
DOI 10.2147/cia.s47263
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yuya Watanabe, Yosuke Yamada, Yoshihiro Fukumoto, Tatsuro Ishihara, Keiichi Yokoyama, Tsukasa Yoshida, Motoko Miyake, Emi Yamagata, Misaka Kimura

Abstract

It is well known that loss of muscle mass (quantitative change) is a major change that occurs with aging. Qualitative changes in skeletal muscle, such as increased intramuscular fat, also occur as one ages. Enhanced echo intensity (EI) on ultrasonography images of skeletal muscle is believed to reflect muscle quality. Recent studies evaluating the quality of skeletal muscle using computer-aided gray scale analysis showed that EI is associated with muscle strength independently of age or muscle size in middle-aged and elderly women. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether muscle quality based on EI is associated with muscle strength independently of muscle size for elderly men.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 312 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 305 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 44 14%
Student > Bachelor 40 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 12%
Researcher 35 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 28 9%
Other 63 20%
Unknown 66 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 100 32%
Sports and Recreations 40 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 34 11%
Engineering 14 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 3%
Other 31 10%
Unknown 83 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2016.
All research outputs
#6,571,272
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#618
of 1,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,960
of 206,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#11
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,705 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.