↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Drugs potentially affecting the extent of airways reversibility on pulmonary function testing are frequently consumed despite guidelines

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
Drugs potentially affecting the extent of airways reversibility on pulmonary function testing are frequently consumed despite guidelines
Published in
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, August 2013
DOI 10.2147/copd.s44612
Pubmed ID
Authors

Terry E Jones, AnneMarie Southcott, Sean Homan

Abstract

The increase in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) effected by a bronchodilator is routinely assessed when patients undertake pulmonary function testing (PFT). Several drug classes can theoretically affect the magnitude of the increase in FEV1. Withholding periods are advised for many but not all such drugs. Anecdotally, many subjects presenting for PFT are found to have taken drugs that might affect the test. We did an audit of patients presenting for PFT to assess the frequency with which FEV1 reversibility might be affected by drugs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 6%
Unknown 15 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Lecturer 1 6%
Professor 1 6%
Student > Master 1 6%
Other 3 19%
Unknown 5 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 19%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 13%
Social Sciences 1 6%
Unknown 5 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2013.
All research outputs
#3,138,736
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#355
of 2,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,023
of 210,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#2
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,577 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,078 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.