| Title |
Gestational diabetes: risks, management, and treatment options
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Women's Health, October 2010
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ijwh.s13333 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Catherine Kim |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 309 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 308 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 53 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 47 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 10% |
| Researcher | 26 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 21 | 7% |
| Other | 37 | 12% |
| Unknown | 93 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 96 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 37 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 38 | 12% |
| Unknown | 105 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2017.
All research outputs
#1,904,254
of 22,958,253 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Women's Health
#98
of 782 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,185
of 99,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Women's Health
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,958,253 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 782 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,656 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them