↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Promoting physical activity for elders with compromised function: the Lifestyle Interventions and Independence for Elders (LIFE) Study physical activity intervention

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Interventions in Aging, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
176 Mendeley
Title
Promoting physical activity for elders with compromised function: the Lifestyle Interventions and Independence for Elders (LIFE) Study physical activity intervention
Published in
Clinical Interventions in Aging, September 2013
DOI 10.2147/cia.s49737
Pubmed ID
Authors

W Jack Rejeski, Robert Axtell, Roger Fielding, Jeffrey Katula, Abby C King, Todd M Manini, Anthony P Marsh, Marco Pahor, Alvito Rego, Catrine Tudor-Locke, Mark Newman, Michael P Walkup, Michael E Miller

Abstract

The Lifestyle Interventions and Independence for Elders (LIFE) Study is a Phase III randomized controlled clinical trial (Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01072500) that will provide definitive evidence regarding the effect of physical activity (PA) on major mobility disability in older adults (70-89 years old) who have compromised physical function. This paper describes the methods employed in the delivery of the LIFE Study PA intervention, providing insight into how we promoted adherence and monitored the fidelity of treatment. Data are presented on participants' motives and self-perceptions at the onset of the trial along with accelerometry data on patterns of PA during exercise training. Prior to the onset of training, 31.4% of participants noted slight conflict with being able to meet the demands of the program and 6.4% indicated that the degree of conflict would be moderate. Accelerometry data collected during PA training revealed that the average intensity - 1,555 counts/minute for men and 1,237 counts/minute for women - was well below the cutoff point used to classify exercise as being of moderate intensity or higher for adults. Also, a sizable subgroup required one or more rest stops. These data illustrate that it is not feasible to have a single exercise prescription for older adults with compromised function. Moreover, the concept of what constitutes "moderate" exercise or an appropriate volume of work is dictated by the physical capacities of each individual and the level of comfort/stability in actually executing a specific prescription.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 169 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 19%
Researcher 27 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 12%
Student > Bachelor 15 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 24 14%
Unknown 46 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 13%
Sports and Recreations 19 11%
Psychology 14 8%
Social Sciences 10 6%
Other 18 10%
Unknown 57 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2014.
All research outputs
#2,996,072
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#312
of 1,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,305
of 212,478 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#8
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,478 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.