↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

A comparison of the efficacy, safety, and longevity of two different hyaluronic acid dermal fillers in the treatment of severe nasolabial folds: a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled…

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
Title
A comparison of the efficacy, safety, and longevity of two different hyaluronic acid dermal fillers in the treatment of severe nasolabial folds: a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blind, within-subject study
Published in
Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, December 2011
DOI 10.2147/ccid.s26055
Pubmed ID
Authors

Greg J Goodman, Phillip Bekhor, Michael Rich, Robert H Rosen, Michael B Halstead, John D Rogers

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 15%
Researcher 4 10%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Unspecified 2 5%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 10 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 30%
Engineering 3 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Unspecified 2 5%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 12 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2016.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#387
of 905 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,112
of 246,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 905 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,216 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.