↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

A comparison of the efficacy, safety, and longevity of two different hyaluronic acid dermal fillers in the treatment of severe nasolabial folds: a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled…

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
A comparison of the efficacy, safety, and longevity of two different hyaluronic acid dermal fillers in the treatment of severe nasolabial folds: a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blind, within-subject study
Published in
Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, December 2011
DOI 10.2147/ccid.s26055
Pubmed ID
Authors

Greg Goodman, Bekhor, Rich, Rosen, Michael Halstead, Rogers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 22%
Student > Postgraduate 2 9%
Researcher 2 9%
Lecturer 1 4%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 2 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 52%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 9%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 4 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2016.
All research outputs
#1,948,245
of 7,909,849 outputs
Outputs from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#68
of 209 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,166
of 245,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#5
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 7,909,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 61st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 209 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,994 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.