↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Review of soft tissue augmentation in the face

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, August 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
Title
Review of soft tissue augmentation in the face
Published in
Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, August 2009
DOI 10.2147/ccid.s3631
Authors

James Newman

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 2%
Unknown 54 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 20%
Student > Master 9 16%
Other 6 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 5%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 14 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 45%
Chemistry 4 7%
Materials Science 4 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Engineering 2 4%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 13 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2018.
All research outputs
#4,740,163
of 22,959,818 outputs
Outputs from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#252
of 737 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,386
of 111,179 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,959,818 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 737 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,179 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them