↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Perioral rejuvenation: restoration of attractiveness in aging females by minimally invasive procedures

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Interventions in Aging, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
Title
Perioral rejuvenation: restoration of attractiveness in aging females by minimally invasive procedures
Published in
Clinical Interventions in Aging, September 2013
DOI 10.2147/cia.s48102
Pubmed ID
Authors

Uwe Wollina

Abstract

Lips and the perioral area are of outstanding importance in youthful appearance, attractiveness, and beauty. In contrast to younger and middle aged females, there is only scant published data on minimally invasive procedures to restore and revitalize lips and perioral soft tissue in elderly females. In this review we report the signs of aging in this particular region and the underlying anatomy. We review studies on lip restoration in younger females and present our techniques for elderly women. With an individually tailored approach, elderly females benefit from minimally invasive techniques.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 21%
Student > Postgraduate 8 19%
Researcher 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 7%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 9 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 53%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 8 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2019.
All research outputs
#3,697,685
of 15,640,467 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#408
of 1,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,967
of 168,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#10
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,640,467 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,503 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,344 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.