| Title |
Effect of the sun on visible clinical signs of aging in Caucasian skin
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ccid.s44686 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Frederic Flament, Roland Bazin, Sabine Laquieze, Virginie Rubert, Elisa Simonpietri, Bertrand Piot |
| Abstract |
AGING SIGNS CAN BE CLASSIFIED INTO FOUR MAIN CATEGORIES: wrinkles/texture, lack of firmness of cutaneous tissues (ptosis), vascular disorders, and pigmentation heterogeneities. During a lifetime, skin will change in appearance and structure not only because of chronological and intrinsic processes but also due to several external factors such as gravity, sun and ultraviolet exposure, and high levels of pollution; or lifestyle factors that have important and obvious effects on skin aging, such as diet, tobacco, illness, or stress. The effect of these external factors leads to progressive degradations of tegument that appear with different kinetics. The aim of this study was to clinically quantify the effect of sun exposure on facial aging in terms of the appearance of new specific signs or in terms of increasing the classical signs of aging. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 209 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Thailand | 15 | 7% |
| United States | 10 | 5% |
| Japan | 9 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 2% |
| Poland | 4 | 2% |
| Spain | 3 | 1% |
| Ireland | 2 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 14 | 7% |
| Unknown | 143 | 68% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 198 | 95% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 4% |
| Scientists | 2 | <1% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 231 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 225 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 34 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 33 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 10% |
| Other | 16 | 7% |
| Other | 38 | 16% |
| Unknown | 66 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 59 | 26% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 27 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 25 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 13 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 29 | 13% |
| Unknown | 71 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 641. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2024.
All research outputs
#34,713
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#2
of 919 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168
of 213,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 919 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,391 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them