↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Is cochlear implantation a good treatment method for profoundly deafened elderly?

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Interventions in Aging, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
Is cochlear implantation a good treatment method for profoundly deafened elderly?
Published in
Clinical Interventions in Aging, October 2013
DOI 10.2147/cia.s50698
Pubmed ID
Authors

Magdalena Lachowska, Agnieszka Pastuszka, Paulina Glinka, Kazimierz Niemczyk

Abstract

To assess the benefits of cochlear implantation in the elderly.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 43 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 14%
Student > Master 5 11%
Other 4 9%
Researcher 4 9%
Other 13 30%
Unknown 5 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 30%
Engineering 5 11%
Psychology 4 9%
Computer Science 3 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 10 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2013.
All research outputs
#2,129,002
of 4,505,030 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#351
of 640 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,615
of 99,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#31
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,505,030 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 640 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,187 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.