↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Vitamin D in asthma and future perspectives

Overview of attention for article published in Drug Design, Development and Therapy, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
128 Mendeley
Title
Vitamin D in asthma and future perspectives
Published in
Drug Design, Development and Therapy, September 2013
DOI 10.2147/dddt.s50599
Pubmed ID
Authors

Haidong Huang, Konstantinos Porpodis, Paul Zarogoulidis, Kalliopi Domvri, Paschalina Giouleka, Antonis Papaiwannou, Stella Primikyri, Efi Mylonaki, Dionysis Spyratos, Wolfgang Hohenforst-Schmidt, Ioannis Kioumis, Konstantinos Zarogoulidis

Abstract

Humans have the ability to synthesize vitamin D during the action of ultraviolet (UV) radiation upon the skin. Apart from the regulation of calcium and phosphate metabolism, another critical role for vitamin D in immunity and respiratory health has been revealed, since vitamin D receptors have also been found in other body cells. The term "vitamin D insufficiency" has been used to describe low levels of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D that may be associated with a wide range of pulmonary diseases, including viral and bacterial respiratory infection, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and cancer. This review focuses on the controversial relationship between vitamin D and asthma. Also, it has been found that different gene polymorphisms of the vitamin D receptor have variable associations with asthma. Other studies investigated the vitamin D receptor signaling pathway in vitro or in experimental animal models and showed either a beneficial or a negative effect of vitamin D in asthma. Furthermore, a range of epidemiological studies has also suggested that vitamin D insufficiency is associated with low lung function. In the future, clinical trials in different asthmatic groups, such as infants, children of school age, and ethnic minorities are needed to establish the role of vitamin D supplementation to prevent and/or treat asthma.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 125 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 27 21%
Student > Master 20 16%
Researcher 11 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Student > Postgraduate 8 6%
Other 23 18%
Unknown 31 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 3%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 37 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2014.
All research outputs
#8,474,037
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Drug Design, Development and Therapy
#636
of 2,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,633
of 212,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drug Design, Development and Therapy
#15
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,268 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,473 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.