↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Why do seniors leave resistance training programs?

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Interventions in Aging, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
14 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
Title
Why do seniors leave resistance training programs?
Published in
Clinical Interventions in Aging, March 2017
DOI 10.2147/cia.s128324
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elissa Burton, Anne-Marie Hill, Simone Pettigrew, Gill Lewin, Liz Bainbridge, Kaela Farrier, Phil Airey, Keith D Hill

Abstract

The proportion of the population, that is older, is growing at a faster rate than other age groups. Physical activity is important for older people because it assists in living independently. Participating in resistance training on a regular basis (twice weekly) is recommended for older people; yet, fewer than 15% of people over 60 years achieve this level. The aim of this article was to investigate the factors contributing to older people's decisions to stop participation in a resistance training program. Participants were older people who had chosen to participate in a structured resistance training program specifically designed for seniors and then after a period of time discontinued. This population received a questionnaire in the mail focused on factors contributing to their cessation of resistance training exercise. Qualitative results were analyzed using inductive content analysis. Fifty-six survey responses were received (average age 71.5 years, SD =9.0; 79% females). Injury, illness, and holidaying were the main reasons for ceasing participation. A small but important number of responses (11%) reported that they considered they were not provided with sufficient support during the resistance training programs. To attract and retain their senior clients, the results indicate that program organizers need to provide tailored support to return to resistance training after injury and offer flexible and individualized services that accommodate older people's life choices in retirement.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 102 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 11%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Researcher 9 9%
Student > Postgraduate 5 5%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 38 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 19 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 13%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 43 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,458,325
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#150
of 1,962 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,394
of 324,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#6
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,962 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,971 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.