Title |
Adjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal cancer: age differences in factors influencing patients' treatment decisions
|
---|---|
Published in |
Patient preference and adherence, August 2013
|
DOI | 10.2147/ppa.s50970 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Mikaela L Jorgensen, Jane M Young, Michael J Solomon |
Abstract |
Older colorectal cancer patients are significantly less likely than younger patients to receive guideline-recommended adjuvant chemotherapy. Previous research has indicated that patient refusal of treatment is a contributing factor. This study aimed to identify potential barriers to adjuvant chemotherapy use in older patients by examining the associations between patient age, factors influencing chemotherapy treatment decisions, and preferences for information and decision-making involvement. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 48 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 16% |
Student > Master | 8 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 16% |
Other | 3 | 6% |
Researcher | 3 | 6% |
Other | 5 | 10% |
Unknown | 14 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 39% |
Psychology | 3 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 4% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
Other | 7 | 14% |
Unknown | 15 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2013.
All research outputs
#19,945,185
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#1,293
of 1,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,972
of 210,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#28
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,757 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,083 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.