↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Symptom burden and job absenteeism after treatment with additional catheter-directed thrombolysis for deep vein thrombosis

Overview of attention for article published in Patient related outcome measures, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Symptom burden and job absenteeism after treatment with additional catheter-directed thrombolysis for deep vein thrombosis
Published in
Patient related outcome measures, September 2013
DOI 10.2147/prom.s47233
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tone Enden, Kløw, P.M. Sandset

Abstract

Additional catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) for acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT) reduces long-term postthrombotic syndrome and is likely to represent a cost-effective alternative treatment compared to the standard treatment of anticoagulation and elastic compression stockings. Accelerated thrombus resolution has also been suggested to improve symptoms and patient function in the acute phase. We aimed to investigate whether additional CDT led to fewer symptoms and job absenteeism during the first 6 months after initiation of DVT treatment compared to standard treatment alone.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 6%
Unknown 16 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 18%
Researcher 3 18%
Other 2 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 12%
Other 3 18%
Unknown 2 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 59%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 12%
Unspecified 1 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2013.
All research outputs
#3,067,306
of 4,507,509 outputs
Outputs from Patient related outcome measures
#29
of 42 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,350
of 101,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient related outcome measures
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,507,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one scored the same or higher as 13 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,300 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.