↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Muscular strength measurements indicate bone mineral density loss in postmenopausal women

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Interventions in Aging, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
Muscular strength measurements indicate bone mineral density loss in postmenopausal women
Published in
Clinical Interventions in Aging, October 2013
DOI 10.2147/cia.s48447
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhixiong Zhou, Lu Zheng, Dengyun Wei, Ming Ye, Xun Li

Abstract

The literature is inconsistent and inconclusive on the relationship between bone mineral density (BMD) and muscular strength in postmenopausal women.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 2%
Portugal 1 2%
Unknown 40 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 12%
Professor 3 7%
Researcher 3 7%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 12 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 8 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Engineering 2 5%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 17 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2014.
All research outputs
#15,740,505
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#1,051
of 1,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,994
of 219,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#23
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 219,848 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.