↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Predictors of communication preferences in patients with chronic low back pain

Overview of attention for article published in Patient preference and adherence, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
Title
Predictors of communication preferences in patients with chronic low back pain
Published in
Patient preference and adherence, October 2013
DOI 10.2147/ppa.s50695
Pubmed ID
Authors

Erik Farin, Erika Schmidt, Lukas Gramm

Abstract

The objective of this exploratory study was to identify patient-related predictors of communication preferences in patients with chronic low back pain for various dimensions of patient-physician communication (patient participation and orientation, effective and open communication, emotionally supportive communication, communication about personal circumstances).

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Mongolia 1 1%
Unknown 68 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 20%
Researcher 12 17%
Student > Bachelor 11 15%
Student > Master 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 10%
Other 13 18%
Unknown 7 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 25%
Psychology 12 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Social Sciences 4 6%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 14 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2014.
All research outputs
#2,791,629
of 16,732,377 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#154
of 1,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,753
of 192,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#6
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,732,377 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,284 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,818 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.