↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Predictors of communication preferences in patients with chronic low back pain

Overview of attention for article published in Patient preference and adherence, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
Title
Predictors of communication preferences in patients with chronic low back pain
Published in
Patient preference and adherence, October 2013
DOI 10.2147/ppa.s50695
Pubmed ID
Authors

Erik Farin, Lukas Gramm, Erika Schmidt

Abstract

The objective of this exploratory study was to identify patient-related predictors of communication preferences in patients with chronic low back pain for various dimensions of patient-physician communication (patient participation and orientation, effective and open communication, emotionally supportive communication, communication about personal circumstances).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Mongolia 1 1%
Unknown 91 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 16%
Student > Bachelor 13 14%
Researcher 12 13%
Student > Master 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 9%
Other 22 23%
Unknown 16 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 22%
Psychology 13 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 13%
Unspecified 7 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 23 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2014.
All research outputs
#4,788,328
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#302
of 1,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,012
of 219,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#5
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,759 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 219,927 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.