↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

A study of patient experience and perception regarding postoperative pain management in Chinese hospitals

Overview of attention for article published in Patient preference and adherence, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
A study of patient experience and perception regarding postoperative pain management in Chinese hospitals
Published in
Patient preference and adherence, November 2013
DOI 10.2147/ppa.s53235
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhen Zhang, Weiran Liu, Lei Zhang, Stephanie Woo, Anliu Tang, Shumin Xie, Jing Zhang, Kai Zhang

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the current status of postoperative pain management in the People's Republic of China's provincial-level hospitals, and the existing knowledge and opinions held by patients regarding these methods.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 22%
Student > Postgraduate 3 17%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Other 3 17%
Unknown 2 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 39%
Psychology 4 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Social Sciences 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 2 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2013.
All research outputs
#17,702,587
of 22,729,647 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#1,161
of 1,590 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,393
of 213,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#15
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,729,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,590 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,637 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.