↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Effect of 10-week core stabilization exercise training and detraining on pain-related outcomes in patients with clinical lumbar instability

Overview of attention for article published in Patient preference and adherence, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#43 of 1,052)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
12 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
Title
Effect of 10-week core stabilization exercise training and detraining on pain-related outcomes in patients with clinical lumbar instability
Published in
Patient preference and adherence, November 2013
DOI 10.2147/ppa.s50436
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rungthip Puntumetakul, Pattanasin Areeudomwong, Alongkot Emasithi, Junichiro Yamauchi

Abstract

Clinical lumbar instability causes pain and socioeconomic suffering; however, an appropriate treatment for this condition is unknown. This article examines the effect of a 10 week core stabilization exercise (CSE) program and 3 month follow-up on pain-related outcomes in patients with clinical lumbar instability.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Spain 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 108 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 26 23%
Student > Master 24 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 11%
Student > Postgraduate 11 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 10%
Other 20 18%
Unknown 9 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 19%
Sports and Recreations 20 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 12 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2016.
All research outputs
#1,015,096
of 12,522,829 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#43
of 1,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,788
of 238,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#2
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,522,829 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,052 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,074 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.