↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Comparison of high-resolution Scheimpflug and high-frequency ultrasound biomicroscopy to anterior-segment OCT corneal thickness measurements

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Comparison of high-resolution Scheimpflug and high-frequency ultrasound biomicroscopy to anterior-segment OCT corneal thickness measurements
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, November 2013
DOI 10.2147/opth.s53718
Pubmed ID
Authors

John Kanellopoulos, George Asimellis

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare and correlate central corneal thickness in healthy, nonoperated eyes with three advanced anterior-segment imaging systems: a high-resolution Scheimpflug tomography camera (Oculyzer II), a spectral-domain anterior-segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) system, and a high-frequency ultrasound biomicroscopy (HF-UBM) system.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 40 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 17%
Researcher 7 17%
Student > Bachelor 6 15%
Student > Postgraduate 4 10%
Other 3 7%
Other 10 24%
Unknown 4 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 49%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Physics and Astronomy 2 5%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 8 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2013.
All research outputs
#12,611,958
of 21,353,728 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#943
of 2,969 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,228
of 303,487 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#15
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,353,728 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,969 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 303,487 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.