↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Nanotechnology-based drug delivery systems and herbal medicines: a review

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Nanomedicine, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
456 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
675 Mendeley
Title
Nanotechnology-based drug delivery systems and herbal medicines: a review
Published in
International Journal of Nanomedicine, December 2013
DOI 10.2147/ijn.s52634
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bruna Vidal Bonifácio, Patricia Bento da Silva, Matheus Aparecido dos Santos Ramos, Kamila Maria Silveira Negri, Taís Maria Bauab, Marlus Chorilli

Abstract

Herbal medicines have been widely used around the world since ancient times. The advancement of phytochemical and phytopharmacological sciences has enabled elucidation of the composition and biological activities of several medicinal plant products. The effectiveness of many species of medicinal plants depends on the supply of active compounds. Most of the biologically active constituents of extracts, such as flavonoids, tannins, and terpenoids, are highly soluble in water, but have low absorption, because they are unable to cross the lipid membranes of the cells, have excessively high molecular size, or are poorly absorbed, resulting in loss of bioavailability and efficacy. Some extracts are not used clinically because of these obstacles. It has been widely proposed to combine herbal medicine with nanotechnology, because nanostructured systems might be able to potentiate the action of plant extracts, reducing the required dose and side effects, and improving activity. Nanosystems can deliver the active constituent at a sufficient concentration during the entire treatment period, directing it to the desired site of action. Conventional treatments do not meet these requirements. The purpose of this study is to review nanotechnology-based drug delivery systems and herbal medicines.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 675 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Algeria 1 <1%
Unknown 669 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 94 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 86 13%
Student > Bachelor 63 9%
Researcher 60 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 32 5%
Other 115 17%
Unknown 225 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 115 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 71 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 56 8%
Chemistry 50 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 43 6%
Other 82 12%
Unknown 258 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2015.
All research outputs
#7,205,295
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#765
of 4,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,098
of 320,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#22
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,123 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,964 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.