Title |
Perceptions of barriers to cardiac rehabilitation use in Brazil
|
---|---|
Published in |
Vascular Health and Risk Management, August 2013
|
DOI | 10.2147/vhrm.s48213 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Gabriela Ghisi, Rafaella Zulianello dos Santos, Aranha, Nunes, Paul Oh, Magnus Benetti, Grace |
Abstract |
Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are the leading cause of mortality in middle-income countries, such as Brazil. However, given the diversity in health care systems in Brazil, access to proven services, such as cardiac rehabilitation (CR), varies widely. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 111 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 17 | 15% |
Researcher | 15 | 13% |
Student > Master | 15 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 5% |
Other | 23 | 20% |
Unknown | 25 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 30 | 26% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 25% |
Psychology | 9 | 8% |
Social Sciences | 7 | 6% |
Sports and Recreations | 4 | 4% |
Other | 5 | 4% |
Unknown | 30 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2013.
All research outputs
#15,288,160
of 22,736,112 outputs
Outputs from Vascular Health and Risk Management
#500
of 754 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,579
of 198,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Vascular Health and Risk Management
#14
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,736,112 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 754 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,434 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.