↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Menatetrenone versus alfacalcidol in the treatment of Chinese postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: a multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, double-dummy, positive drug-controlled clinical trial

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Interventions in Aging, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
Title
Menatetrenone versus alfacalcidol in the treatment of Chinese postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: a multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, double-dummy, positive drug-controlled clinical trial
Published in
Clinical Interventions in Aging, January 2014
DOI 10.2147/cia.s54107
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiao-Ping Xing, Yan Jiang, Zhen-Lin Zhang, Zhong-Lan Zhang, Han-Min Zhu, Yi-Yong Wu, Qun Cheng, Feng-Li Wu, Jian-Li Liu, Wei Yu, Xun-Wu Meng

Abstract

To evaluate whether the efficacy and safety of menatetrenone for the treatment of osteoporosis is noninferior to alfacalcidol in Chinese postmenopausal women.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 3%
Japan 1 3%
Unknown 38 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 30%
Student > Bachelor 7 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Researcher 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Other 10 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 15%
Unspecified 5 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 8%
Other 6 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2019.
All research outputs
#8,323,295
of 13,833,712 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#828
of 1,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,759
of 256,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#37
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,833,712 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,411 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 256,783 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.