Randomized comparison of in vivo performance of two point-of-care tear film osmometers

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, May 2017

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter: 3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation: 30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley: 26 Mendeley

Summary X Dimensions citations

So far, Altmetric has seen 4 X posts from 3 X users, with an upper bound of 43,850 followers.

$TEAR demonstrated accuracy, precision, and agreement with clinical interpretation https://t.co/kM4BXEPYjI https://t.co/Wmbq9hW6Hp

01 Jun 2017

Reply Repost Favourite

@bloom_trades $TEAR Randomized comparison of in vivo performance https://t.co/kM4BXEPYjI the TearLab Osmolarity System demonstrated accuracy, precision

31 May 2017

Reply Repost Favourite

$TEAR Randomised comparison of in vivo performance of TearLab and iPen osmometers. https://t.co/SHoCH6n9lq

24 May 2017

Reply Repost Favourite

Randomised comparison of in vivo performance of TearLab and iPen osmometers. Very interesting... https://t.co/GYNGNx6T8K #GoogleAlerts

23 May 2017

Reply Repost Favourite

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Randomized comparison of in vivo performance of two point-of-care tear film osmometers

About this Attention Score

Mentioned by

Citations

Readers on