↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Managing severe cancer pain: the role of transdermal buprenorphine: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, September 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
Managing severe cancer pain: the role of transdermal buprenorphine: a systematic review
Published in
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, September 2009
DOI 10.2147/tcrm.s4603
Authors

Giovanni Apolone

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 3%
Unknown 38 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 26%
Other 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Professor 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Other 8 21%
Unknown 7 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 49%
Psychology 4 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 7 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2012.
All research outputs
#7,528,880
of 22,974,684 outputs
Outputs from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#416
of 1,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,659
of 92,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,974,684 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,271 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,070 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.