↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Fluoroscopic lumbar interlaminar epidural injections in managing chronic lumbar axial or discogenic pain

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pain Research, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Fluoroscopic lumbar interlaminar epidural injections in managing chronic lumbar axial or discogenic pain
Published in
Journal of Pain Research, August 2012
DOI 10.2147/jpr.s32699
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laxmaiah Manchikanti, Cash, McManus, Pampati, Benyamin

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 19%
Student > Bachelor 4 13%
Student > Master 3 10%
Student > Postgraduate 3 10%
Professor 2 6%
Other 8 26%
Unknown 5 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 58%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Psychology 1 3%
Sports and Recreations 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 6 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2016.
All research outputs
#2,276,065
of 8,702,492 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#220
of 555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,090
of 252,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#22
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,702,492 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 60th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,811 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.