| Title |
Fluoroscopic lumbar interlaminar epidural injections in managing chronic lumbar axial or discogenic pain
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Pain Research, August 2012
|
| DOI | 10.2147/jpr.s32699 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laxmaiah Manchikanti, Kimberly A Cash, Carla D McManus, Vidyasagar Pampati, Ramsin Benyamin |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 44 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 23% |
| Unknown | 11 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 50% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 5% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 11 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2020.
All research outputs
#7,530,253
of 22,977,819 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#758
of 1,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,125
of 165,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#6
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,977,819 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,757 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,297 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.