↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Preferences of patients and health professionals for route and frequency of administration of biologic agents in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis

Overview of attention for article published in Patient preference and adherence, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
Title
Preferences of patients and health professionals for route and frequency of administration of biologic agents in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis
Published in
Patient preference and adherence, January 2014
DOI 10.2147/ppa.s55156
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ole Rintek Madsen, Tuan Khai Huynh, Ann Østergaard, Charlotte Egsmose

Abstract

To examine the preferences of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients and health professionals (HPs) for the route and frequency of administration of biologic drugs.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 5%
Unknown 36 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 18%
Student > Master 5 13%
Other 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 5 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 53%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 16%
Computer Science 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 6 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2014.
All research outputs
#5,967,366
of 11,191,240 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#379
of 918 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,594
of 201,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#19
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,191,240 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 918 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,084 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.