Title |
Treating dyspareunia caused by vaginal atrophy: a review of treatment options using vaginal estrogen therapy
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Women's Health, August 2009
|
DOI | 10.2147/ijwh.s4872 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kingsberg, S Kellogg, M Krychman |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 40 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 9 | 22% |
Researcher | 6 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
Other | 6 | 15% |
Unknown | 11 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 51% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
Engineering | 1 | 2% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 15 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,974,462
of 23,556,846 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Women's Health
#101
of 807 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,663
of 112,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Women's Health
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,556,846 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 807 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 112,153 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.