↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Cognitive decline in normal aging and its prevention: a review on non-pharmacological lifestyle strategies

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Interventions in Aging, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
98 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
335 Mendeley
Title
Cognitive decline in normal aging and its prevention: a review on non-pharmacological lifestyle strategies
Published in
Clinical Interventions in Aging, May 2017
DOI 10.2147/cia.s132963
Pubmed ID
Authors

Blanka Klimova, Martin Valis, Kamil Kuca

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of the selected non-pharmacological lifestyle activities on the delay of cognitive decline in normal aging. This was done by conducting a literature review in the four acknowledged databases Web of Science, Scopus, MEDLINE, and Springer, and consequently by evaluating the findings of the relevant studies. The findings show that physical activities, such as walking and aerobic exercises, music therapy, adherence to Mediterranean diet, or solving crosswords, seem to be very promising lifestyle intervention tools. The results indicate that non-pharmacological lifestyle intervention activities should be intense and possibly done simultaneously in order to be effective in the prevention of cognitive decline. In addition, more longitudinal randomized controlled trials are needed in order to discover the most effective types and the duration of these intervention activities in the prevention of cognitive decline, typical of aging population groups.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 335 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 334 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 49 15%
Student > Master 47 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 10%
Researcher 28 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 5%
Other 53 16%
Unknown 108 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 39 12%
Psychology 39 12%
Neuroscience 27 8%
Social Sciences 13 4%
Other 55 16%
Unknown 117 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2022.
All research outputs
#3,257,968
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#338
of 1,962 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,946
of 325,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#12
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,962 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,074 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.