↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Cognitive decline in normal aging and its prevention: a review on non-pharmacological lifestyle strategies

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Interventions in Aging, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
216 Mendeley
Title
Cognitive decline in normal aging and its prevention: a review on non-pharmacological lifestyle strategies
Published in
Clinical Interventions in Aging, May 2017
DOI 10.2147/cia.s132963
Pubmed ID
Authors

Blanka Klimova, Martin Valis, Kamil Kuca

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of the selected non-pharmacological lifestyle activities on the delay of cognitive decline in normal aging. This was done by conducting a literature review in the four acknowledged databases Web of Science, Scopus, MEDLINE, and Springer, and consequently by evaluating the findings of the relevant studies. The findings show that physical activities, such as walking and aerobic exercises, music therapy, adherence to Mediterranean diet, or solving crosswords, seem to be very promising lifestyle intervention tools. The results indicate that non-pharmacological lifestyle intervention activities should be intense and possibly done simultaneously in order to be effective in the prevention of cognitive decline. In addition, more longitudinal randomized controlled trials are needed in order to discover the most effective types and the duration of these intervention activities in the prevention of cognitive decline, typical of aging population groups.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 216 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 215 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 40 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 14%
Student > Bachelor 30 14%
Researcher 19 9%
Other 13 6%
Other 39 18%
Unknown 44 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 37 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 29 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 12%
Neuroscience 18 8%
Sports and Recreations 10 5%
Other 43 20%
Unknown 53 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2020.
All research outputs
#9,940,928
of 17,036,910 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#809
of 1,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,862
of 276,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#23
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,036,910 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,576 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,287 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.