| Title |
Implantable inlay devices for presbyopia: the evidence to date
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Ophthalmology, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.2147/opth.s57056 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Em Arlt, Em Krall, S Moussa, G Grabner, Ak Dexl |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 55 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Researcher | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 11% |
| Other | 14 | 25% |
| Unknown | 8 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 42% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 11% |
| Engineering | 5 | 9% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Unknown | 10 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2021.
All research outputs
#3,415,510
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#261
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,427
of 359,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#5
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,530 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.