| Title |
Prospective study of incidence and predictors of peripheral intravenous catheter-induced complications
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.2147/tcrm.s74685 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mostafa A Abolfotouh, Mahmoud Salam, Ala’a Bani-Mustafa, David White, Hanan H Balkhy |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 147 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 28 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 19% |
| Other | 17 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 10% |
| Researcher | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 18 | 12% |
| Unknown | 38 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 48 | 32% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 23% |
| Engineering | 5 | 3% |
| Psychology | 3 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 8% |
| Unknown | 44 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2017.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#461
of 1,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,159
of 369,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#11
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,146 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.