↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Efficacy and safety of brinzolamide/timolol fixed combination compared with timolol in Japanese patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Efficacy and safety of brinzolamide/timolol fixed combination compared with timolol in Japanese patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, February 2014
DOI 10.2147/opth.s58293
Pubmed ID
Authors

Keiji Yoshikawa, Jun Kozaki, Hidetaka Maeda

Abstract

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of brinzolamide 1%/timolol 0.5% fixed-combination (BRINZ/TIM-FC) therapy compared with timolol 0.5% (TIM) monotherapy in Japanese patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 11%
Student > Master 1 11%
Researcher 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 11%
Unknown 4 44%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2017.
All research outputs
#3,220,643
of 12,077,989 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#204
of 1,508 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,130
of 226,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#5
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,077,989 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,508 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,741 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.