| Title |
Treatment options and outcomes for glioblastoma in the elderly patient
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Interventions in Aging, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.2147/cia.s44259 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nils D Arvold, David A Reardon |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| Turkey | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 60% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 20% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 160 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 13% |
| Other | 17 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 9% |
| Other | 35 | 22% |
| Unknown | 39 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 71 | 44% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 10% |
| Neuroscience | 12 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 6% |
| Unknown | 46 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2017.
All research outputs
#15,563,090
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#1,021
of 1,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,414
of 327,847 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#18
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,980 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,847 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.