↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Comparison of the nerve fiber layer of type 2 diabetic patients without glaucoma with normal subjects of the same age and sex

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Comparison of the nerve fiber layer of type 2 diabetic patients without glaucoma with normal subjects of the same age and sex
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, February 2014
DOI 10.2147/opth.s47762
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dimitrios Alonistiotis, Alexandros Takis, Dimitrios Panagiotidis, Nikolaos Ioannou, Dimitrios Papaconstantinou, Panagiotis Theodossiadis

Abstract

The retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness in patients with diabetes mellitus type 2 was compared to normal subjects of similar age and sex, having first excluded any risk factors for glaucoma. The correlation between the RNFL thickness and the severity of diabetic retinopathy was investigated at its primary stages and with other ocular and diabetic parameters.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 5%
Unknown 19 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 15%
Student > Master 3 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 15%
Researcher 2 10%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 5%
Other 3 15%
Unknown 5 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 50%
Mathematics 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Engineering 1 5%
Unknown 7 35%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2014.
All research outputs
#3,082,600
of 4,507,072 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#502
of 865 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,600
of 107,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#33
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,507,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 865 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.3. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,974 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.