↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

New developments in the assessment of COPD: early diagnosis is key

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
165 Mendeley
Title
New developments in the assessment of COPD: early diagnosis is key
Published in
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, February 2014
DOI 10.2147/copd.s46198
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicholas G Csikesz, Eric J Gartman

Abstract

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the most common chronic lung disease in the world, and its associated health burdens and costs are mounting. Until recently, it was generally accepted that targeting the diagnosis of COPD early in its course was a relatively fruitless effort, since treatments other than already ubiquitous smoking-cessation efforts were unlikely to alter its course. However, there is strong evidence to suggest that the majority of patients with objective COPD are not aware of their condition, and this leads to a significant delay in diagnosis, more aggressive smoking-cessation intervention, and potential treatment. Novel methods of diagnostic testing, community health programs, and primary-care provider recommendations hold promise to expand the recognition of COPD in its incipient stages - where recent evidence suggests a rapid decline in lung function occurs and may be prevented if acted upon. This review explores the evidence to support the efforts to justify programs aimed at early diagnosis, alternative diagnostic strategies that may augment traditional spirometry, therapeutic modalities that could potentially be used in the future to alter early lung-function decline, and emphasizes the necessary cooperative role that physicians, patients, communities, and governments need to play to realize the significant health impact that stands to be gained.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 163 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 15%
Student > Bachelor 21 13%
Researcher 18 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 11%
Other 14 8%
Other 24 15%
Unknown 46 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 6%
Engineering 10 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Other 30 18%
Unknown 48 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2021.
All research outputs
#4,139,601
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#498
of 2,571 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,405
of 323,682 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#9
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,571 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,682 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.