↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Discrepancies in Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia (CSDD) items between residents and caregivers, and the CSDD's factor structure

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Interventions in Aging, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
Title
Discrepancies in Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia (CSDD) items between residents and caregivers, and the CSDD's factor structure
Published in
Clinical Interventions in Aging, June 2013
DOI 10.2147/cia.s45201
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nahathai Wongpakaran, Tinakon Wongpakaran, Robert van Reekum

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
Unknown 63 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 13%
Researcher 8 13%
Student > Master 8 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 19 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 23%
Psychology 13 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 9%
Social Sciences 4 6%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 18 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2013.
All research outputs
#17,286,645
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#1,255
of 1,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,278
of 206,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#41
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,481 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.