↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Discrepancies in Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia (CSDD) items between residents and caregivers, and the CSDD's factor structure

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Interventions in Aging, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
Title
Discrepancies in Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia (CSDD) items between residents and caregivers, and the CSDD's factor structure
Published in
Clinical Interventions in Aging, June 2013
DOI 10.2147/cia.s45201
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nahathai Wongpakaran, Tinakon Wongpakaran, van Reekum

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
Unknown 49 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 16%
Student > Master 7 14%
Student > Bachelor 7 14%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 8 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 34%
Psychology 12 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 10%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 7 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2013.
All research outputs
#4,222,945
of 8,019,832 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#562
of 967 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,577
of 104,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#8
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,019,832 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 967 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,470 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.