↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Bacterial microbiome of lungs in COPD

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
7 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
171 Mendeley
Title
Bacterial microbiome of lungs in COPD
Published in
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, February 2014
DOI 10.2147/copd.s38932
Pubmed ID
Authors

Don Sin, Marc Sze, James Hogg

Abstract

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is currently the third leading cause of death in the world. Although smoking is the main risk factor for this disease, only a minority of smokers develop COPD. Why this happens is largely unknown. Recent discoveries by the human microbiome project have shed new light on the importance and richness of the bacterial microbiota at different body sites in human beings. The microbiota plays a particularly important role in the development and functional integrity of the immune system. Shifts or perturbations in the microbiota can lead to disease. COPD is in part mediated by dysregulated immune responses to cigarette smoke and other environmental insults. Although traditionally the lung has been viewed as a sterile organ, by using highly sensitive genomic techniques, recent reports have identified diverse bacterial communities in the human lung that may change in COPD. This review summarizes the current knowledge concerning the lung microbiota in COPD and its potential implications for pathogenesis of the disease.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 171 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 3 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 164 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 38 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 22%
Student > Master 23 13%
Student > Bachelor 21 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 8%
Other 29 17%
Unknown 9 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 48 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 47 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 16%
Immunology and Microbiology 15 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 4%
Other 12 7%
Unknown 15 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2020.
All research outputs
#2,557,946
of 15,341,807 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#330
of 1,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,494
of 190,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#4
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,341,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,813 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,045 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.