↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Injection device-related risk management toward safe administration of medications: experience in a university teaching hospital in The People's Republic of China

Overview of attention for article published in Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
Title
Injection device-related risk management toward safe administration of medications: experience in a university teaching hospital in The People's Republic of China
Published in
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, March 2014
DOI 10.2147/tcrm.s59199
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ling-ling Zhu, Wei Li, Ping Song, Quan Zhou

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 18%
Researcher 8 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 7%
Other 12 20%
Unknown 15 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 14 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 20%
Engineering 5 8%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 19 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2014.
All research outputs
#14,915,476
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#638
of 1,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,673
of 236,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#10
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,354 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.