↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Cost-effectiveness analysis of orbital atherectomy plus balloon angioplasty vs balloon angioplasty alone in subjects with calcified femoropopliteal lesions

Overview of attention for article published in ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 tweeter
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Cost-effectiveness analysis of orbital atherectomy plus balloon angioplasty vs balloon angioplasty alone in subjects with calcified femoropopliteal lesions
Published in
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR, March 2014
DOI 10.2147/ceor.s59568
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tiffini Diage, Barry Weinstock, Raymond Dattilo

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 10%
Unknown 9 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 60%
Other 2 20%
Student > Master 1 10%
Unspecified 1 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 70%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 10%
Unspecified 1 10%
Engineering 1 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2018.
All research outputs
#3,155,887
of 12,834,493 outputs
Outputs from ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR
#78
of 349 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,044
of 189,691 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR
#9
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,834,493 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 349 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,691 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.