↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Cost-effectiveness analysis of orbital atherectomy plus balloon angioplasty vs balloon angioplasty alone in subjects with calcified femoropopliteal lesions

Overview of attention for article published in ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Cost-effectiveness analysis of orbital atherectomy plus balloon angioplasty vs balloon angioplasty alone in subjects with calcified femoropopliteal lesions
Published in
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR, March 2014
DOI 10.2147/ceor.s59568
Pubmed ID
Authors

Barry Weinstock, Raymond Dattilo, Tiffini Diage

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 5%
Unknown 18 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 37%
Other 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Lecturer 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 5 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 47%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 5 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2018.
All research outputs
#7,236,093
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR
#144
of 525 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,709
of 236,521 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR
#7
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 525 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,521 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.