↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Antibacterial effect of silver nanoparticles in Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Overview of attention for article published in Nanotechnology Science and Applications, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
3 patents
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
230 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
376 Mendeley
Title
Antibacterial effect of silver nanoparticles in Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Published in
Nanotechnology Science and Applications, June 2017
DOI 10.2147/nsa.s133415
Pubmed ID
Authors

R Salomoni, P Léo, AF Montemor, Rinaldi, MFA Rodrigues

Abstract

Pseudomonas aeruginosa has great intrinsic antimicrobial resistance limiting the number of effective antibiotics. Thus, other antimicrobial agents such as silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) are considered potential agents to help manage and prevent infections. AgNPs can be used in several applications against bacteria resistant to common antibiotics or even multi-resistant bacteria such as P. aeruginosa. This study assessed the antimicrobial activity of commercial 10 nm AgNPs on two hospital strains of P. aeruginosa resistant to a large number of antibiotics and a reference strain from a culture collection. All strains were susceptible to 5 µg/mL nanoparticles solution. Reference strains INCQS 0230 and P.a.1 were sensitive to AgNPs at concentrations of 1.25 and 0.156 µg/mL, respectively; however, this was not observed for hospital strain P.a.2, which was more resistant to all antibiotics and AgNPs tested. Cytotoxicity evaluation indicated that AgNPs, up to a concentration of 2.5 µg/mL, are very safe for all cell lines tested. At 5.0 µg/mL, AgNPs had a discrete cytotoxic effect on tumor cells HeLa and HepG2. Results showed the potential of using AgNPs as an alternative to conventional antimicrobial agents that are currently used, and a perspective for application of nanosilver with antibiotics to enhance antimicrobial activity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 376 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 376 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 60 16%
Student > Master 49 13%
Researcher 48 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 4%
Other 47 13%
Unknown 117 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 51 14%
Chemistry 38 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 27 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 26 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 6%
Other 65 17%
Unknown 145 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2023.
All research outputs
#5,369,046
of 25,165,468 outputs
Outputs from Nanotechnology Science and Applications
#21
of 63 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,248
of 322,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nanotechnology Science and Applications
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,165,468 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 63 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,315 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them