↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Comparison of transtibial and transportal techniques in drilling femoral tunnels during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using 3D-CAD models.

Overview of attention for article published in Open access journal of sports medicine, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Comparison of transtibial and transportal techniques in drilling femoral tunnels during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using 3D-CAD models.
Published in
Open access journal of sports medicine, April 2014
DOI 10.2147/oajsm.s59297
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yasutaka Tashiro, Ken Okazaki, Munenori Uemura, Kanji Osaki, Hirokazu Matsubara, Kazutaka Toyoda, Makoto Hashizume, Yukihide Iwamoto

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 5%
Unknown 20 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 19%
Student > Master 4 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 14%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Other 4 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 76%
Unspecified 3 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Engineering 1 5%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2015.
All research outputs
#643,056
of 4,809,133 outputs
Outputs from Open access journal of sports medicine
#1,273
of 16,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,106
of 115,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Open access journal of sports medicine
#85
of 780 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,809,133 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,007 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 115,939 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 780 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.