↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Multifunctional nanosystems: growing sanguinity in siRNA therapy

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Nanomedicine, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Multifunctional nanosystems: growing sanguinity in siRNA therapy
Published in
International Journal of Nanomedicine, April 2014
DOI 10.2147/ijn.s57440
Authors

Khan Farheen Badrealam, Mohammad Owais

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unknown 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2014.
All research outputs
#2,125,755
of 4,506,837 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#470
of 1,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,331
of 106,983 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#75
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,506,837 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,146 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,983 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.