↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Periocular and anterior orbital necrosis after upper eyelid gold weight loading: operation-related or self-inflicted?

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Periocular and anterior orbital necrosis after upper eyelid gold weight loading: operation-related or self-inflicted?
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, April 2014
DOI 10.2147/opth.s59245
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roy Schwartz, Ran Ben Cnaan, Ophir Schein, Michael Giladi, Michal Raz, Igal Leibovitch

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 17%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Other 3 25%
Unknown 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 58%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Neuroscience 1 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 8%
Unknown 2 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2014.
All research outputs
#3,099,756
of 4,506,837 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#531
of 865 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,015
of 108,458 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#55
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,506,837 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 865 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.4. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,458 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.