Title |
Assessment of cumulative exposure to UVA through study of asymmetric facial skin damage
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical Interventions in Aging, September 2010
|
DOI | 10.2147/cia.s13044 |
Authors |
Philippe Humbert |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Indonesia | 1 | 2% |
Brazil | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 52 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 17 | 31% |
Other | 9 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 9% |
Professor | 3 | 6% |
Other | 3 | 6% |
Unknown | 11 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 30% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 20% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 7% |
Chemistry | 3 | 6% |
Engineering | 2 | 4% |
Other | 5 | 9% |
Unknown | 13 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2014.
All research outputs
#4,835,823
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#493
of 1,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,997
of 103,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#5
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,821 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.