↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Efficacy versus safety: the dilemma of using novel platelet inhibitors for the treatment of patients with ischemic stroke and coronary artery disease

Overview of attention for article published in Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Efficacy versus safety: the dilemma of using novel platelet inhibitors for the treatment of patients with ischemic stroke and coronary artery disease
Published in
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, May 2014
DOI 10.2147/tcrm.s39216
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gianmarco Iannopollo, Rita Camporotondo, Gaetano M De Ferrari, Sergio Leonardi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 24%
Researcher 3 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Lecturer 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 6 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 43%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 6 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2014.
All research outputs
#7,204,882
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#365
of 1,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,215
of 242,178 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#6
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,178 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.