↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Comparative study of Y-split recession versus bilateral medial rectus recession for surgical management of infantile esotropia

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Comparative study of Y-split recession versus bilateral medial rectus recession for surgical management of infantile esotropia
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, May 2014
DOI 10.2147/opth.s59036
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nermeen Badawi, Khaled Hegazy

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 24%
Librarian 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 6%
Other 4 24%
Unknown 5 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 41%
Environmental Science 1 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 5 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2014.
All research outputs
#20,656,161
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#2,605
of 3,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,333
of 242,178 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#41
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,712 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,178 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.