↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Ineffectiveness of intrastromal voriconazole for filamentous fungal keratitis

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
Title
Ineffectiveness of intrastromal voriconazole for filamentous fungal keratitis
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, June 2014
DOI 10.2147/opth.s63516
Pubmed ID
Authors

Masanori Niki, Hiroshi Eguchi, Yuki Hayashi, Tatsuro Miyamoto, Fumika Hotta, Yoshinori Mitamura

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 3%
India 1 3%
Unknown 38 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 18%
Researcher 5 13%
Student > Postgraduate 4 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 10 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 48%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 14 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2023.
All research outputs
#6,374,015
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#542
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,896
of 240,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#6
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,967 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.