↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Ineffectiveness of intrastromal voriconazole for filamentous fungal keratitis

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
Ineffectiveness of intrastromal voriconazole for filamentous fungal keratitis
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, June 2014
DOI 10.2147/opth.s63516
Authors

Hiroshi Eguchi, Yuki Hayashi, Tatsuro Miyamoto, Fumika Hotta, Yoshinori Mitamura, Masanori Niki

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 3%
India 1 3%
Unknown 28 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 23%
Researcher 5 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 13%
Student > Postgraduate 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 4 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 57%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2014.
All research outputs
#7,836,212
of 12,488,808 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#707
of 1,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,964
of 189,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#23
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,488,808 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,597 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,975 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.