↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

The King Vision™ video laryngoscope for awake intubation: series of cases and literature review

Overview of attention for article published in Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
The King Vision™ video laryngoscope for awake intubation: series of cases and literature review
Published in
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, June 2014
DOI 10.2147/tcrm.s64638
Authors

Tomasz Gaszynski, Ewelina Gaszynska

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 6%
Unknown 16 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 24%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 18%
Student > Postgraduate 2 12%
Professor 1 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Other 4 24%
Unknown 2 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 82%
Psychology 1 6%
Unknown 2 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2014.
All research outputs
#3,094,111
of 4,506,935 outputs
Outputs from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#305
of 397 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,809
of 107,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#18
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,506,935 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 397 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,295 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.