↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Understanding benefits and addressing misperceptions and barriers to intrauterine device access among populations in the United States

Overview of attention for article published in Patient preference and adherence, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 tweeters
facebook
10 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
Title
Understanding benefits and addressing misperceptions and barriers to intrauterine device access among populations in the United States
Published in
Patient preference and adherence, July 2014
DOI 10.2147/ppa.s45710
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennie Yoost

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 103 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 19%
Student > Bachelor 16 15%
Researcher 16 15%
Other 6 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 6%
Other 16 15%
Unknown 24 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 14%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 17 16%
Unknown 27 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2020.
All research outputs
#1,486,418
of 22,075,848 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#56
of 1,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,240
of 203,586 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#1
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,075,848 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 203,586 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.