↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Differences in systemic inflammation between cigarette and biomass smoke-induced COPD

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
Title
Differences in systemic inflammation between cigarette and biomass smoke-induced COPD
Published in
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, September 2017
DOI 10.2147/copd.s141068
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rafael Golpe, Irene Martín-Robles, Pilar Sanjuán-López, Luis Pérez-de-Llano, Carlos González-Juanatey, José L López-Campos, Elena Arellano-Orden

Abstract

It is known that biomarkers of systemic inflammation are raised in COPD caused by tobacco (T-COPD) compared with healthy controls, but there is less information on the inflammatory status of subjects with COPD caused by biomass smoke (B-COPD). In addition, the possible (if any) differences in inflammation between both types of the disease are still not well known. The aim of this study was to assess the inflammatory profile in B-COPD and T-COPD. A total of 20 subjects (15 men and five women) with T-COPD were matched one to one for sex, age and forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) to 20 B-COPD patients. In all, 20 sex-matched healthy subjects with normal lung function without smoking history or biomass exposure were included as controls. The following biomarkers were measured: exhaled nitric oxide, serum IL-6, IL-8, IL-5, IL-13, periostin, surfactant protein-P, TNF-α, IgE, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein and fibrinogen. Complete blood count was also obtained. The age of the subjects was 70.2±7.9 years and FEV1% was 56.2%±14.6%. Most inflammatory biomarkers were higher in both types of COPD than in healthy controls. IL-6, IL-8 and IL-5 were significantly higher in T-COPD than in B-COPD, without other significant differences. Both types of COPD are associated with high levels of systemic inflammation biomarkers. T-COPD patients have a higher systemic inflammatory status than the patients with B-COPD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 70 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 7 10%
Researcher 7 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Other 6 9%
Student > Master 6 9%
Other 14 20%
Unknown 23 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 25 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2017.
All research outputs
#20,663,600
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#2,079
of 2,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#251,382
of 324,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#60
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,578 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,453 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.