| Title |
Risk scores and geriatric profile: can they really help us in anticoagulation decision making among older patients suffering from atrial fibrillation?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Interventions in Aging, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.2147/cia.s62597 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Frédéric Maes, Olivia Dalleur, Séverine Henrard, Dominique Wouters, Christophe Scavée, Anne Spinewine, Benoit Boland |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Peru | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Slovenia | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 131 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 22 | 16% |
| Researcher | 18 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 29 | 21% |
| Unknown | 38 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 60 | 43% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 4% |
| Psychology | 4 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 9% |
| Unknown | 42 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2014.
All research outputs
#15,982,793
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#1,102
of 1,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,049
of 242,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#20
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,345 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.